On February 16, a federal judge in Brownsville, TX heard the pleas of tens of thousands of NPG supporters – and millions of other concerned Americans like you.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen courageously upheld the legally enacted U.S. immigration policies…
…when he granted a preliminary injunction against President Obama’s upcoming executive amnesty program!
Judge Hanen seems to agree with NPG’s position on high immigration rates: he acknowledged that all of the states in question would “suffer irreparable harm” if this “virtually irreversible” amnesty were to take place.
Last Monday’s injunction effectively blocks Obama’s plans from moving forward, but it came just in the nick of time. The first of the President’s amnesty orders was scheduled to begin only days after Hanen stepped forward!
This injunction protects and maintains immigration limits that are essential to avoiding runaway population growth…
…but we cannot afford to stop now!
We need your help RIGHT NOW to keep the pressure on our elected officials! While this injunction will temporarily prevent the President’s disastrous plan for mass amnesty by Executive Order – it is NOT a permanent block.
NPG is planning an aggressive agenda during this critical time: a massive email campaign to bring more Americans into our ranks, powerful advertisements in nationally-distributed publications, and influential new NPG Forum papers written by leading experts in the field. So please – let us know that we can count on your continued commitment!
Your generous contribution today will help keep up our critical momentum to stop executive amnesty – and goes directly towards our work for reasonable, responsible immigration policies – policies which WON’T increase U.S. population and WON’T rob future generations of their American dream!
World population, now over 7.3 billion, is predicted to rise to 9 billion by 2050, an increase of almost two billion, or 23%, in the short space of only 34 years from now.In the highly unlikely event that per capita greenhouse gas emissions could possibly be decreased by an equal percentage in such a short space of time (a blink of an eye) the total amount of worldwide emission would remain the same!
From this simple illustration it would appear that without drastically reducing the size of world population, there is no solution to the problem.None at all.So then why do our world leaders pretend that there is one?What is to be gained by pretending rather than by proposing a solution that would solve the problem – a reduction in the size of world population to not more than 1- 2 billion?
Latest posts by NPG (see all)
- NPG Awards National Student Scholarshipsfor 2018-2019 Academic Year - July 17, 2018
- THE EPA, CAR EMISSIONS, AND CALIFORNIA - July 12, 2018
- NPG is Pleased to Announce the Winners of Our 2018 Essay Scholarship Contest - July 9, 2018