Open Appeal To The 114th Congress

This Ad appeared in The Washington Times on August 17, 2015.


See the advertisement as it appeared in major publications.



The current policy of unrestricted birthright citizenship adds hundreds of thousands of people to our already overpopulated nation each year. It’s time to come to our senses and reform this outdated and insane practice once and for all by passing The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2015.

The issue of automatic birthright citizenship should not be a partisan issue. It is so clear-cut, it must be separated immediately from the debate over “Dreamers” and other reforms that involve tens of millions of immigrants.

Doing away with automatic birthright citizenship should be a simple YES/NO vote.
That vote must be taken soon!

The law must be changed to clarify that American citizenship would only be granted to a child born in the United States when at least one parent is a citizen, has a green card, or has served in the military. Passing Senator David Vitter’s S. 45 or Congressman Steve King’s H.R. 140 would make that happen.

We are now to a point where an entire multi-billion dollar industry is being built by those who recruit pregnant foreign women to travel to America to give birth and gain a future foothold for entire families to eventually come to our country. Passing the Birthright Citizenship Act will bring a halt to this open mockery of our laws.

In addition, it is estimated that as many as 350,000 anchor babies are born in the U.S. annually, greatly adding to our already out-of-control population numbers. This must be stopped!

National polls continue to show that the majority of Americans support eliminating automatic birthright citizenship. Please listen to the people. Reform this reckless policy today.



There is no remedy that can possibly avert disastrous Climate Change and Global Warming unless we first address the problem of world population size and growth, and its impact on the size of the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.That means that we need to address the population size and growth of each nation, which together make up the world total.

World population, now over 7.3 billion, is predicted to rise to 9 billion by 2050, an increase of almost two billion, or 23%, in the short space of only 34 years from now.In the highly unlikely event that per capita greenhouse gas emissions could possibly be decreased by an equal percentage in such a short space of time (a blink of an eye) the total amount of worldwide emission would remain the same!

From this simple illustration it would appear that without drastically reducing the size of world population, there is no solution to the problem.None at all.So then why do our world leaders pretend that there is one?What is to be gained by pretending rather than by proposing a solution that would solve the problem – a reduction in the size of world population to not more than 1- 2 billion?
Like and Share:
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial