California Gas Leak

According to Southern California Public Radio: “Southern California gas company has taken more than one-quarter of its wells offline at the same natural gas storage field where a disastrous leak last year forced thousands of… families to leave the area. ” As NPG reported to you in January, California Governor Jerry Brown “declared a state of emergency… over a major gas leak in the Los Angeles suburb of Porter Ranch.” The leak was discovered in late October 2015, and the Southern California Gas Company (locally known as “SoCalGas”) was unable to stop the natural gas from pouring out into the atmosphere.

And this was no small leak – i twas large enough to have caused a huge impact on the local community. According to ABC News: “[SoCalGas moved] thousands of people concerned about the leak, with at least 2,292 households accepting relocation, according to the company.” And now, health officials have declared they found “metals in dust samples from Porter Ranch homes near the gas leak. …Thousands of residents have not returned to their homes despite the massive gas leak being capped. …Over the course of 16 weeks, an estimated 107,000 tons of methane flowed out of the well.”

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, the leak was “equivalent to the yearly greenhouse gas emissions from more than 480,000 passenger vehicles….”

In response to the leak, early this year California’s state Senate unveiled a package of bills with “several key elements, including increasing inspections and safety requirements for the state’s natural gas infrastructure… The well in question is more than 60 years old and a safety valve that would have likely prevented this leak was removed in the 1970s due to a different leak. It was never replaced.”


Just days before the State of Emergency was declared, the California Department of Finance released its annual population estimates for the state. According to the report, Los Angeles County’s population reached 10.2 million – the largest in the state. The state’s population also grew by a net of 83,906 international immigrants and Los Angeles County saw the most new immigrants of the entire state.

NPG has long drawn the links between reckless immigration policies, U.S. population growth, and the dangerous strain on our aging infrastructure.

Since our founding in 1972, NPG has worked to change the way Americans think about population growth. And 44 years later, we’re still on the front lines publishing new research, reaching out to elected leaders, educating our nation’s students, and putting our message in major national publications that reach millions of Americans.

And our work is far from over nearly every day, the headlines are filled with another environmental crisis, another executive order, another piece of legislation in Congress, or another city enacting policies with dangerous population-increasing consequences.

There’s a responsibility inherent in being an American citizen:we must act as stewards, protecting our nation and planet for our children and grandchildren. That includes a slow and gradual reduction in U.S. population size.

Thank you for everything you do to support our critical mission. Together, we’re working for a livable future!


There is no remedy that can possibly avert disastrous Climate Change and Global Warming unless we first address the problem of world population size and growth, and its impact on the size of the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.That means that we need to address the population size and growth of each nation, which together make up the world total.

World population, now over 7.3 billion, is predicted to rise to 9 billion by 2050, an increase of almost two billion, or 23%, in the short space of only 34 years from now.In the highly unlikely event that per capita greenhouse gas emissions could possibly be decreased by an equal percentage in such a short space of time (a blink of an eye) the total amount of worldwide emission would remain the same!

From this simple illustration it would appear that without drastically reducing the size of world population, there is no solution to the problem.None at all.So then why do our world leaders pretend that there is one?What is to be gained by pretending rather than by proposing a solution that would solve the problem – a reduction in the size of world population to not more than 1- 2 billion?
Like and Share:
Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial