|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY RATE QUALITY OF LIFE
| REGION |
EXCELLENT |
GOOD |
FAIR |
POOR |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
57
36.5 |
85
54.5 |
11
7.1 |
0
0.0 |
3
1.9 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
44
41.1 |
54
50.5 |
5
4.7 |
0
0.0 |
4
3.7 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
30
25.0 |
65
54.2 |
22
18.3 |
3
2.5 |
0
0.0 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
24
27.6 |
47
54.0 |
13
14.9 |
0
0.0 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
16
19.5 |
49
59.8 |
14
17.1 |
0
0.0 |
3
3.7 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
21
25.0 |
54
64.3 |
5
6.0 |
3
3.6 |
1
1.2 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
192 |
354 |
70 |
6 |
14 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY TREND QUALITY OF LIFE
| REGION |
IMPROVE |
SAME |
DETERIORAT |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
6
3.8 |
44
28.2 |
94
60.3 |
12
7.7 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
7
6.5 |
25
50.5 |
67
62.6 |
8
7.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
23
19.2 |
35
29.2 |
55
45.8 |
7
5.8 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
14
16.1 |
33
37.9 |
37
42.5 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
14
17.1 |
29
35.4 |
37
45.1 |
2
2.4 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
11
13.1 |
18
21.4 |
51
60.7 |
4
4.8 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
75 |
184 |
341 |
36 |
636 |
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY THREAT TO QUALITY OF LIFE
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
58
37.2 |
55
35.3 |
27
17.3 |
7
4.5 |
9
5.8 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
35
32.7 |
38
35.5 |
15
14.0 |
12
11.2 |
7
6.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
17
14.2 |
43
35.8 |
38
31.7 |
14
11.7 |
8
6.7 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
6
6.9 |
30
34.5 |
32
36.8 |
16
18.4 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
8
9.8 |
37
45.1 |
22
26.8 |
11
13.4 |
4
4.9 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
18
21.4 |
39
46.4 |
14
16.7 |
9
10.7 |
4
4.8 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
142 |
242 |
148 |
69 |
35 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY BIGGEST PROBLEM
| REGION |
TRAFFIC |
SPRAWL |
OVERCROWD |
EDUCATION |
ENVIRO |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
63
40.4 |
8
5.1 |
13
8.3 |
34
21.8 |
7
4.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
18
16.8 |
2
1.9 |
13
12.1 |
32
29.9 |
5
4.7 |
| HAMPTON RD |
9
7.5 |
4
3.3 |
7
5.8 |
30
25.0 |
6
5.0 |
| RICHMD MET |
6
6.9 |
8
9.2 |
2
2.3 |
10
11.5 |
5
5.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
1
1.2 |
0
0.0 |
3
3.7 |
17
20.7 |
5
6.1 |
| RONK/STHWT |
12
14.3 |
0
0.0 |
1
1.2 |
16
19.0 |
10
11.9 |
| TOTAL |
109 |
22 |
39 |
139 |
38 |
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY BIGGEST PROBLEM
| REGION |
HOUSING $ |
ECONOMY |
CRIME |
HEALTHCARE |
OTHER |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
2
1.3 |
2
1.3 |
7
4.5 |
1
0.6 |
7
4.55 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
0
0.0 |
0
0.0 |
12
11.2 |
1
0.9 |
10
9.3 |
| HAMPTON RD |
1
0.8 |
11
9.2 |
22
18.3 |
0
0.0 |
7
5.8 |
| RICHMD MET |
1
1.1 |
5
5.7 |
13
14.9 |
2
2.3 |
3
3.4 |
| LYN/STHSID |
0
0.0 |
17
20.7 |
10
12.2 |
4
4.9 |
6
7.31 |
| RONK/STHWT |
0
0.0 |
13
15.5 |
13
15.5 |
6
7.1 |
1
1.2 |
| TOTAL |
4 |
48 |
77 |
14 |
34 |
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY BIGGEST PROBLEM
| REGION |
DK/REFUSED |
TAXES |
VALUES/SOC |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
6
3.8 |
0
0.0 |
6
3.8 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
7
6.5 |
2
1.9 |
5
4.7 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
13
10.8 |
7
5.8 |
3
2.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
6
6.9 |
12
13.8 |
14
16.1 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
8
9.8 |
3
3.7 |
8
9.8 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
5
6.0 |
2
2.4 |
5
6.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
45 |
26 |
41 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY POPULATION GROWTH URGENT
| REGION |
IMPROVE |
SAME |
DETERIORAT |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
6
3.8 |
44
28.2 |
94
60.3 |
12
7.7 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
7
6.5 |
25
50.5 |
67
62.6 |
8
7.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
23
19.2 |
35
29.2 |
55
45.8 |
7
5.8 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
14
16.1 |
33
37.9 |
37
42.5 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
14
17.1 |
29
35.4 |
37
45.1 |
2
2.4 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
11
13.1 |
18
21.4 |
51
60.7 |
4
4.8 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
75 |
184 |
341 |
36 |
636 |
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY THREAT TO QUALITY OF LIFE
| REGION |
EXTREME UR |
SW URGENT |
NOT TOO UR |
NOT AT ALL |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
57
36.5 |
72
46.2 |
18
11.5 |
4
2.6 |
5
3.2 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
30
28.0 |
61
57.0 |
11
10.3 |
0
0.0 |
5
4.7 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
19
15.8 |
58
48.3 |
28
23.3 |
12
10.0 |
3
2.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
5
5.7 |
44
50.6 |
28
32.2 |
5
5.7 |
5
5.7 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
7
8.5 |
47
57.3 |
12
14.6 |
14
17.1 |
2
2.4 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
16
19.0 |
49
58.3 |
13
15.5 |
4
4.8 |
2
2.4 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
134 |
331 |
110 |
39 |
22 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY POPULATION IN REGION TOO LARGE
| REGION |
TOO LARGE |
JUST RIGHT |
TOO SMALL |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
104
66.7 |
48
30.8 |
0
0.0 |
4
2.6 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
43
40.2 |
57
53.3 |
0
0.0 |
7
6.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
42
35.0 |
72
60.0 |
0
0.0 |
6
5.0 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
30
34.5 |
48
55.2 |
0
0.0 |
9
10.3 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
11
13.4 |
61
74.4 |
6
7.3 |
4
4.9 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
12
14.3 |
66
78.6 |
6
7.1 |
0
0.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
242 |
352 |
12 |
30 |
636 |
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY SPRAWL
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
35
22.4 |
45
28.8 |
39
25.0 |
22
14.1 |
15
9.6 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
16
15.0 |
30
28.0 |
28
26.2 |
16
15.0 |
17
15.9 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
9
7.5 |
24
20.0 |
51
42.5 |
22
18.3 |
14
11.7 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
10
11.5 |
8
9.2 |
46
52.9 |
20
23.0 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
9
11.0 |
24
29.3 |
36
43.9 |
9
11.0 |
4
4.9 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
17
20.2 |
21
25.0 |
28
33.3 |
15
17.9 |
3
3.6 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
96 |
152 |
228 |
104 |
56 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY RESIDENTIAL GRWOTH
| REGION |
TOO FAST |
LITLE FAST |
RGHT PACE |
TOO SLOW |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
77
49.4 |
39
25.0 |
34
21.8 |
2
1.3 |
4
2.6 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
43
40.2 |
33
30.8 |
23
21.5 |
6
5.6 |
2
1.9 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
40
33.3 |
26
21.7 |
38
31.7 |
9
7.5 |
7
5.8 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
23
26.4 |
24
27.6 |
26
29.9 |
11
12.6 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
7
8.5 |
19
23.2 |
42
51.2 |
8
9.8 |
6
7.3 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
17
20.2 |
18
21.4 |
44
52.4 |
5
6.0 |
0
0.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
207 |
159 |
207 |
41 |
22 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY COMMERCIAL GROWTH
| REGION |
TOO FAST |
LITLE FAST |
RGHT PACE |
TOO SLOW |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
44
28.2 |
47
30.1 |
61
39.1 |
3
1.9 |
1
0.6 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
27
25.2 |
27
25.2 |
36
33.6 |
11
10.3 |
6
5.6 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
27
22.5 |
16
13.3 |
47
39.2 |
25
20.8 |
5
4.2 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
25
28.7 |
11
12.6 |
41
47.1 |
9
10.3 |
1
1.1 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
1
1.2 |
7
8.5 |
23
28.0 |
47
57.3 |
4
4.9 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
14
16.7 |
7
8.3 |
33
39.3 |
30
35.7 |
0
0.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
138 |
115 |
241 |
125 |
17 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY TRAFFIC
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
93
59.6 |
38
24.4 |
10
6.4 |
9
5.8 |
6
3.8 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
49
45.8 |
15
14.0 |
21
19.6 |
19
17.8 |
3
2.1 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
48
40.0 |
21
17.5 |
31
25.8 |
17
14.2 |
3
2.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
28
32.2 |
15
17.2 |
30
34.5 |
9
10.3 |
5
5.7 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
31
37.8 |
13
15.9 |
24
29.3 |
14
17.1 |
0
0.0 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
33
39.3 |
19
22.6 |
16
19.0 |
14
16.7 |
2
2.4 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
282 |
121 |
132 |
82 |
19 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY NATURAL RESOURCES THREATENED
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
94
60.3 |
47
30.1 |
7
4.5 |
6
3.8 |
2
1.2 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
62
57.9 |
22
20.6 |
7
6.5 |
4
3.7 |
12
11.2 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
57
47.5 |
36
30.0 |
15
12.5 |
10
8.3 |
2
1.7 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
28
32.2 |
29
33.3 |
20
23.0 |
7
8.0 |
3
3.4 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
30
36.6 |
30
36.6 |
11
13.4 |
8
9.8 |
3
3.7 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
39
46.4 |
29
34.5 |
9
10.7 |
2
2.4 |
5
6.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
310 |
193 |
69 |
37 |
27 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY SCHOOLS QUALITY THREATENED
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
73
46.8 |
41
26.3 |
22
14.1 |
8
5.1 |
12
7.7 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
53
49.5 |
24
22.4 |
12
11.2 |
17
15.9 |
1
0.9 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
57
47.5 |
23
19.2 |
23
19.2 |
11
9.2 |
6
5.0 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
25
28.7 |
23
26.4 |
29
33.3 |
10
11.5 |
0
0.0 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
39
47.6 |
22
26.8 |
15
18.3 |
6
7.3 |
0
0.0 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
42
50.0 |
13
15.5 |
22
26.2 |
5
6.0 |
2
2.4 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
289 |
146 |
123 |
57 |
21 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
51
32.7 |
51
32.7 |
41
26.3 |
5
3.2 |
8
5.1 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
41
38.3 |
41
38.3 |
8
7.5 |
9
8.4 |
8
7.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
42
35.0 |
30
25.0 |
25
20.8 |
14
11.7 |
9
7.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
16
18.4 |
27
31.0 |
30
34.5 |
6
6.9 |
8
9.2 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
27
32.9 |
24
29.3 |
21
25.6 |
8
9.8 |
2
2.4 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
33
39.3 |
29
34.5 |
19
22.6 |
3
3.6 |
0
0.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
210 |
202 |
144 |
45 |
35 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY GROWTH IS NECESSARY
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
19
12.2 |
35
22.4 |
55
35.3 |
47
30.1 |
0
0.0 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
16
15.0 |
36
33.6 |
25
23.4 |
30
28.0 |
0
0.0 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
33
27.5 |
34
28.3 |
33
27.5 |
17
14.2 |
3
2.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
9
10.3 |
41
47.1 |
22
25.3 |
9
10.3 |
6
6.9 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
25
30.5 |
35
42.7 |
9
11.0 |
9
11.0 |
4
4.9 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
23
27.4 |
38
45.2 |
17
20.2 |
6
7.1 |
0
0.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
125 |
219 |
161 |
118 |
13 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY BENEFITS DEVELOPERS
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
61
39.1 |
32
20.5 |
32
20.5 |
27
17.3 |
4
2.6 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
39
36.4 |
25
23.4 |
21
19.6 |
14
13.1 |
8
7.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
35
29.2 |
41
34.2 |
17
14.2 |
15
12.5 |
12
10.0 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
17
19.5 |
33
37.9 |
13
14.9 |
10
11.5 |
14
16.1 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
16
19.5 |
34
41.5 |
20
24.4 |
5
6.1 |
7
8.5 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
31
36.9 |
25
29.8 |
20
23.8 |
5
6.0 |
3
3.6 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
199 |
190 |
123 |
76 |
48 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY IMMIGRATION LEVEL IS A CONCERN
| REGION |
EXTREME CO |
SW CONCERN |
NOT TOO CN |
NOT AT ALL |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
43
27.6 |
62
39.7 |
35
22.4 |
14
9.0 |
2
1.3 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
33
30.8 |
50
46.7 |
19
17.8 |
5
4.7 |
0
0.0 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
32
26.7 |
49
40.8 |
23
19.2 |
14
11.7 |
2
1.7 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
14
16.1 |
42
48.3 |
24
27.6 |
5
5.7 |
2
2.3 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
20
24.4 |
34
41.5 |
18
22.0 |
10
12.2 |
0
0.0 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
42
50.0 |
23
27.4 |
11
13.1 |
6
7.1 |
2
2.4 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
184 |
260 |
130 |
54 |
8 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY LOWER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
37
23.7 |
36
23.1 |
52
33.3 |
23
14.7 |
8
5.1 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
26
24.3 |
24
22.4 |
33
30.8 |
16
15.0 |
8
7.5 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
22
18.3 |
37
30.8 |
28
23.3 |
24
20.0 |
9
7.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
14
16.1 |
16
18.4 |
30
34.5 |
16
18.4 |
11
12.6 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
19
23.2 |
22
26.8 |
22
26.8 |
13
15.9 |
6
7.3 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
34
40.5 |
31
36.9 |
10
11.9 |
9
10.7 |
0
0.0 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
152 |
166 |
175 |
101 |
42 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY SUPPORT CANDIDATE LOWER IMMIGRATION
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
44
28.2 |
32
20.5 |
54
34.6 |
19
12.2 |
7
4.5 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
31
29.0 |
26
24.3 |
26
24.3 |
11
10.3 |
13
12.1 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
33
27.5 |
35
29.2 |
22
18.3 |
17
14.2 |
13
10.8 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
13
14.9 |
32
36.8 |
17
19.5 |
18
20.7 |
7
8.0 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
23
28.0 |
24
29.3 |
17
20.7 |
12
14.6 |
6
7.3 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
37
44.0 |
29
34.5 |
11
13.1 |
5
6.0 |
2
2.4 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
181 |
178 |
147 |
82 |
48 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY STATE POLICY PREFERENCE
| REGION |
STATE A |
SW AGREE |
STATE B |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
97
62.2 |
37
23.7 |
22
14.1 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
63
58.9 |
30
28.0 |
14
13.1 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
60
50.0 |
29
24.2 |
31
25.8 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
56
64.4 |
18
20.7 |
13
14.9 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
41
50.0 |
35
42.7 |
6
7.3 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
49
58.3 |
28
33.3 |
7
8.3 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
366 |
177 |
93 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIALS
| REGION |
VERY CONF |
SW CONF |
NOT TOO CO |
NOT AT ALL |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
4
2.6 |
32
20.5 |
62
39.7 |
54
34.6 |
4
2.6 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
5
4.7 |
51
47.7 |
25
23.4 |
20
18.7 |
6
5.6 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
5
4.2 |
47
39.2 |
55
45.8 |
11
9.2 |
2
1.7 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
2
2.3 |
31
35.6 |
39
44.8 |
13
14.9 |
2
2.3 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
2
2.4 |
49
59.8 |
17
20.7 |
8
9.8 |
6
7.3 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
4
4.8 |
41
48.8 |
21
25.0 |
14
16.7 |
4
4.8 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
22 |
251 |
219 |
120 |
24 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY LEADERS HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
56
35.9 |
75
48.1 |
18
11.5 |
2
1.3 |
5
3.2 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
39
36.4 |
43
40.2 |
10
9.3 |
6
5.6 |
9
8.4 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
33
27.5 |
38
31.7 |
22
18.3 |
11
9.2 |
16
13.3 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
30
34.5 |
29
33.3 |
17
19.5 |
9
10.3 |
2
2.3 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
21
25.6 |
33
40.2 |
13
15.9 |
13
15.9/P> |
2
2.4 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
25
29.8 |
35
41.7 |
7
8.3 |
13
15.5 |
4
4.8 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
204 |
253 |
87 |
54 |
38 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
CROSS TABULATION OF REGION BY TAXES
| REGION |
STRONG AG |
SW AGREE |
SW DISAGRE |
STRONG DIS |
DK/REFUSED |
TOTAL |
NORTHERN
ROW % |
40
25.6 |
37
23.7 |
49
31.4 |
22
5.1 |
8
24.5 |
156
24.5 |
| SHEN/PEIDM |
17
15.9 |
37
34.6 |
27
25.2 |
20
18.7 |
6
5.6 |
107
16.8 |
| HAMPTON RD |
13
10.8 |
40
33.3 |
23
19.2 |
41
34.2 |
3
2.5 |
120
18.9 |
| RICHMD MET |
9
10.3 |
25
28.7 |
35
40.2 |
17
19.5 |
1
1.1 |
87
13.7 |
| LYN/STHSID |
9
11.0 |
15
18.3 |
35
42.7 |
21
25.6 |
2
2.4 |
82
12.9 |
| RONK/STHWT |
15
17.9 |
17
20.2 |
23
27.4 |
27
32.1 |
2
2.4 |
84
13.2 |
| TOTAL |
103 |
171 |
192 |
148 |
22 |
636 |
| CASES INCLUDED |
636 |
MISSING CASES |
0 |
|
|
|
|
